4 ms·
I watched one of the new hires burn 8 hours in chatGPT trying to make excel do something that took me five minutes. Not worried for anything but the economy
by lowlevel 2y ago
I watched one of the new hires burn 8 hours in chatGPT trying to make excel do something that took me five minutes. Not worried for anything but the economy and the environment.
- bamboozled 2y agoI think it's great if you know what you want it to do and you prompt appropriately. Can save quite a lot of time if you already have some experience.
- tenzing 2y agoExactly this. In their current state, ChatGPT (and Claude, etc) are a great boost for people who already have good foundational knowledge. They'll probably speed up learning in general, but are no replacement for an in-depth understanding.
- MarcelOlsz 2y agoI saw a guy on twitter boasting about launching some micro saas with 28,000+ prompts and doing "no coding". I'd pay to see that codebase.
- lifestyleguru 2y agoIt's the same as using Google search instead of programming skills, then Stack Overflow instead of programming skills, and in the meantime there was also WYSIWYG programming.
- rsynnott 2y ago> and in the meantime there was also WYSIWYG programming. Oh, that one's perennial; it periodically shows up, promising to obsolete programmers, and has since the 1980s.
- lifestyleguru 2y agoThen let AI arrange together the boxes and arrows? Should work.
- btreecat 2y agoWhile I have seen similar (engineer struggle to get claud to write some TF that could have been done in a few min) I also have experienced the opposite. I was attempting to put together some basic statistics for my oncall shift, so I downloaded the CSV from our system and used DuckDB to inspect. I had never used DuckDB before so using an LLM to help me refine my queries was great. Even with a few turds of a reply it still mostly helped save time. Knowing when to stop and try a different approach is the same underlying skill that some devs don't exercise and others do.