7 ms·

Kagi accepts bitcoins but Vlad (the founder) mentioned on their forum that so few people use this option that it does not make sense to work on accepting Monero

by jacekm 2y ago

Kagi accepts bitcoins but Vlad (the founder) mentioned on their forum that so few people use this option that it does not make sense to work on accepting Monero.

mhitza 2y ago
Kagi's privacy guarantee is more of a "trust me bro" and I say that as a Kagi subscriber. While they may claim that they preserve privacy or anonimity as long as it's tied to a user account, or payment information nothing prevents them from associating searches with user. Even protonmail enabled logging for a particular user at one point. Their guarantee is on the same level. At the same time, privacy pass is a very foreign concept to me. If they are transferable between devices, one could generate a couple and resell them over some other medium (even in person).
- freediver 2y ago
  We implemented Privacy Pass exactly so that you do not need to trust any claims we make but as a user have a (provable, cryptographically) mechanism that guarantees this, with one click, whenever you need it.
- thibaultmol 2y ago
  the privacy pass extension is open source exactly because users can then verify the process. and yeah, to prevent reselling they've made it so you can't get infinite tokens.
- Thorrez 2y ago
  >as long as it's tied to a user account, or payment information Privacy Pass unties the searches from the user account and payment information.
deleted 2y ago
[deleted]
freediver 2y ago
(vlad here) Rather, we are opportunistic about it and we want to focus on things that make impact (which most of the time is search, not billing). If there is enough demand, we will work on Monero support - and yes I agree, buying privacy pass tokens, without even needing an account, is one of those super-cool use cases.
- freedomben 2y ago
  I'd love to pay for Kagi with crypto, the main thing for me is the steep transfer fees. Nevertheless those can be offset somewhat with bulk payments. How about ability to buy like 3 years of Kagi at a time with crypto? When I try to go into billing in Kagi I just get forwarded to Stripe. Does Stripe process the crypto payments?
  - kobieps 2y ago
    paying with bitcoin lightning has close to zero transfer fees edit: on desktop, on the page where you choose your plan, scroll to the bottom and look for the link to paying with OpenNode (btc lightning)
    - lawn 2y ago
      Lightning just isn't a good option as you first have to pay the expensive Bitcoin fees just to be able to use it... (And hope that you'll find a route otherwise you'll have to do it again.)
      - kobieps 2y ago
        If $0.27 is an expensive fee then I don't have any answers to that. Yeah routing can suck. First timers should use a lightning wallet with built in LSP support like ZEUS, BitKit, Phoenix, etc. Then routing is a non-issue.
        lawn 2y ago
        Bitcoin average transaction fees is rarely under $1: https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_average_transaction_fee https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_average_transaction_f... I think it's better to use another cryptocurrency like Monero than having to rely on a centralized service just to get a half-decent user experience.
akimbostrawman 2y ago
Nobody wants to use BTC because of high fees and at this point its less a usable exchange of value than speculative asset. I personally would only ever use and trust a online service advertised as private/anonymous if it actually supported a private and anonymous currency (like some vpns do).
- kobieps 2y ago
  Anyone claiming high fees is straw manning
  - akimbostrawman 2y ago
    Lightning is a meme. Imagine needing a sperate glued on system to be somewhat tolerable at the thing it was created for.
    - kobieps 2y ago
      Calling it an experiment would be more accurate than declaring it has already failed.
      - akimbostrawman 2y ago
        I don't care for semantics. It's just one of numerous issues making btc unfit as a currency.

by jacekm 2y ago

Kagi accepts bitcoins but Vlad (the founder) mentioned on their forum that so few people use this option that it does not make sense to work on accepting Monero.

mhitza 2y ago

Kagi's privacy guarantee is more of a "trust me bro" and I say that as a Kagi subscriber. While they may claim that they preserve privacy or anonimity as long as it's tied to a user account, or payment information nothing prevents them from associating searches with user. Even protonmail enabled logging for a particular user at one point. Their guarantee is on the same level. At the same time, privacy pass is a very foreign concept to me. If they are transferable between devices, one could generate a couple and resell them over some other medium (even in person).

freediver 2y ago
We implemented Privacy Pass exactly so that you do not need to trust any claims we make but as a user have a (provable, cryptographically) mechanism that guarantees this, with one click, whenever you need it.
thibaultmol 2y ago
the privacy pass extension is open source exactly because users can then verify the process. and yeah, to prevent reselling they've made it so you can't get infinite tokens.
Thorrez 2y ago
>as long as it's tied to a user account, or payment information Privacy Pass unties the searches from the user account and payment information.

deleted 2y ago

[deleted]

freediver 2y ago

(vlad here) Rather, we are opportunistic about it and we want to focus on things that make impact (which most of the time is search, not billing). If there is enough demand, we will work on Monero support - and yes I agree, buying privacy pass tokens, without even needing an account, is one of those super-cool use cases.

freedomben 2y ago
I'd love to pay for Kagi with crypto, the main thing for me is the steep transfer fees. Nevertheless those can be offset somewhat with bulk payments. How about ability to buy like 3 years of Kagi at a time with crypto? When I try to go into billing in Kagi I just get forwarded to Stripe. Does Stripe process the crypto payments?
- kobieps 2y ago
  paying with bitcoin lightning has close to zero transfer fees edit: on desktop, on the page where you choose your plan, scroll to the bottom and look for the link to paying with OpenNode (btc lightning)
  - lawn 2y ago
    Lightning just isn't a good option as you first have to pay the expensive Bitcoin fees just to be able to use it... (And hope that you'll find a route otherwise you'll have to do it again.)
    - kobieps 2y ago
      If $0.27 is an expensive fee then I don't have any answers to that. Yeah routing can suck. First timers should use a lightning wallet with built in LSP support like ZEUS, BitKit, Phoenix, etc. Then routing is a non-issue.
      - lawn 2y ago
        Bitcoin average transaction fees is rarely under $1: https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_average_transaction_fee https://ycharts.com/indicators/bitcoin_average_transaction_f... I think it's better to use another cryptocurrency like Monero than having to rely on a centralized service just to get a half-decent user experience.

akimbostrawman 2y ago

Nobody wants to use BTC because of high fees and at this point its less a usable exchange of value than speculative asset. I personally would only ever use and trust a online service advertised as private/anonymous if it actually supported a private and anonymous currency (like some vpns do).

kobieps 2y ago
Anyone claiming high fees is straw manning
- akimbostrawman 2y ago
  Lightning is a meme. Imagine needing a sperate glued on system to be somewhat tolerable at the thing it was created for.
  - kobieps 2y ago
    Calling it an experiment would be more accurate than declaring it has already failed.
    - akimbostrawman 2y ago
      I don't care for semantics. It's just one of numerous issues making btc unfit as a currency.