4 ms·

It is based on the formerly proprietary StarWriter, from a German company. Later acquired by Sun if I remember correctly, then open sourced. There is another c

It is based on the formerly proprietary StarWriter, from a German company. Later acquired by Sun if I remember correctly, then open sourced. There is another commercial German competitor from this time, SoftMaker. I used to buy the suite for Linux, just recently switched to LibreOffice. I never liked the clunky Libreoffice but since SoftMaker refuses to support LanguageTool.... There is actually a third German text processor from this time, Papyrus. Born on Atari ST. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Division https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Division [2] https://www.softmaker.com/en/products/softmaker-office https://www.softmaker.com/en/products/softmaker-office [3] https://papyrus.de/ https://papyrus.de/ [4] https://papyrusauthor.com/ https://papyrusauthor.com/ English new version of Papyrus seems to be released in a few days.

mr_toad 2y ago
> Later acquired by Sun if I remember correctly, then open sourced. Sun named it OpenOffice. LibreOffice was forked from OpenOffice after Oracle acquired Sun. OpenOffice was subsequently donated to the Apache foundation.
- cookiengineer 2y ago
  Note that this story is only half complete. Oracle stalled development, made the bugtrackers etc private, and kicked out all of the contributors and tried to commercialize the product at the time. The reason for Oracle "dumping" it to the Apache graveyard is that most of the "free" (as in unpaid) contributors switched sides to LibreOffice because of Oracle's hostile behavior towards the development community. And they donated OpenOffice because it was effectively a dead project for a couple of years. There's probably still some contributor talks about it on one of the old CCC conferences on their media server. If you want to learn about how to manage open source, Oracle's track record is a prime example of how not to.
  - ozim 2y ago
    That’s the example how lawyers would manage open source.
  - bee_rider 2y ago
    It is a shame that the OpenOffice name can’t be applied to LibreOffice. OpenOffice was a much better name, imo.
    - yellowapple 2y ago
      Now that it's in the Apache Foundation's hands, my hope is that OO and LO will make amends and merge back together, like what happened with OpenWRT and LEDE. Given how many years they've diverged that might not be possible from a technical standpoint, but at least from a branding standpoint it'd be an improvement.
  - iforgotpassword 2y ago
    Isn't there strong beef between the remaining OO maintainers and the LO folks? It basically prevented LO from just being merged back into OO, instead we got that years-long confusion where non-tech people would download the horribly outdated OO and be like "wow this sucks imma go with MSO!"
    - cookiengineer 2y ago
      Yeah, I would assume that there's still beef between both parties, and I can kind of understand that. If you're getting a cease and desist letter because of some trademark bullshit for your open source forks... then I'd be pissed too. The way Oracle treated the developer community was pretty insane to be honest. Some links for others to read-up: Press Announcement for "Oracle Open Office" which wasn't open anymore: - https://web.archive.org/web/20101217212955/https://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/195766 https://web.archive.org/web/20101217212955/https://www.oracl... Oracle trying to upsell Standard Editions and Enterprise Editions: - https://web.archive.org/web/20100924092655/http://www.oracle.com/us/products/applications/open-office/open-office-170241.html https://web.archive.org/web/20100924092655/http://www.oracle... Announcement of the Document Foundation (Oct 2010, before Oracle's announcement in Dec 2010): - https://web.archive.org/web/20101001004543/http://www.documentfoundation.org/faq https://web.archive.org/web/20101001004543/http://www.docume... IBM being the reason that Oracle donates Open Office to Apache Foundation due to them pointing out to Oracle that their copyleft license agreement with Sun invalidates Oracle's proprietary claims: - https://web.archive.org/web/20131207051759/http://www.h-online.com/open/features/OpenOffice-splits-and-pirouettes-1270296.html https://web.archive.org/web/20131207051759/http://www.h-onli... - https://web.archive.org/web/20110603142320/http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/what-the-heck-is-happening-with-openoffice-update/9025 https://web.archive.org/web/20110603142320/http://www.zdnet....
- johannes1234321 2y ago
  > Sun named it OpenOffice. Slightly more correct: Sun kept StarOffice as a commercial offering and also open sourced it under the name of OpenOffice.org in parallel. The .org was quite important to them in the name. > LibreOffice was forked from OpenOffice after Oracle acquired Sun. The actual forking happens earlier with a patch set living outside Sun and sponsored by some Linux distros for a while. After Oracle's acquisition however the foundation was built and the name LibreOffice was picked.
  - skissane 2y ago
    > The .org was quite important to them in the name. Apparently because, in some country in which Sun did business, someone else had already trademarked “OpenOffice”, but Sun’s lawyers believed the addition of “.org” was enough to sidestep that trademark. I think in many jurisdictions, if someone else already has legal claim to a trademark, sticking “.org” on the end may not be sufficient to escape infringement. But, maybe under the laws of whichever country this trademark existed in, it was. Or at least, so Sun’s lawyers believed-hence, they were quite insistent on including the “.org”
    - joshuaissac 2y ago
      It is owned by a Dutch company that offers automation services: https://web.archive.org/web/20130823152257/http://www.openoffice.nl/merkenregistratie https://web.archive.org/web/20130823152257/http://www.openof... Within Benelux, the company had an agreement with nl.openoffice.org where the latter would include a notice on their website to clarify that they were not affiliated with the trademark holder. According to https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1372955 https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1372955 it was also used by Orange UK, but that happened after OpenOffice.org was released: https://www.zdnet.com/home-and-office/networking/orange-launches-open-office/ https://www.zdnet.com/home-and-office/networking/orange-laun...
- xvilka 2y ago
  The problem is that Apache Foundation is being stubborn[1] to admit the OpenOffice death, which distracts and prevents users from using so much better software (LibreOffice) that harms an open source image and ecosystem in general. [1] https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2020/10/12/open-letter-to-apache-openoffice/ https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2020/10/12/open-let...
  - mksaunders2 2y ago
    Yes, and now there are unfixed security issues in OpenOffice over a year old, so the ASF really, really should put it in the Attic ASAP. If more people in the FOSS world raise awareness about this, perhaps it will finally happen, so users become aware of maintained, fixed successor projects: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_OpenOffice#Security https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_OpenOffice#Security
cpill 2y ago
a 40yo code base. Eeeek!
- chris_wot 2y ago
  No, a 40 year old codebase with only 25 years of commit logs. And the initial commits during the Sun releases are insane - they took a bunch of commits, mashed them together and then added them as a single commit with a log message stating what all the commits they munged together did. Nightmare fuel. Excellent lately though.
  - doubled112 2y ago
    Sounds like my personal git repos. God help us all if I ever need to share them, but I doubt it.
  - ianburrell 2y ago
    The squished logs sounds like what Subversion does with merges. OpenOffice looks to have used Subversion for a while.
    - chris_wot 2y ago
      Yeah, I think they did something like this.
  - mlyle 2y ago
    Honestly, though, looking more than 10 years back in revision control is usually only for curiosity. Whatever historical reasons existed for code to be a certain way are likely impenetrable or no longer relevant.
    - iforgotpassword 2y ago
      Nah, I've often found the opposite to be true. Granted, it requires proper commit messages and code comments, but I've had my fair share of "oooh I see" moments when I encountered nonsensical crazy code. Sometimes it reassured me that it could safely go, other times it revealed a whole new dimension nobody was really aware of anymore that then got a good chunk of comment space in the code base.
cookiengineer 2y ago
There's also onlyoffice [1] which recently got a little more traction due to its integrations for moodle, owncloud, nextcloud etc. I think all of their software is AGPL3 licensed last time I checked. Their suite somewhat targets selfhosted collaboration for the web browser. [1] https://www.onlyoffice.com/ https://www.onlyoffice.com/
- eptcyka 2y ago
  Has anyone audited/read their code. I found it very suspicous that a company as small as them would be able to deliver software as complex as it was on the face of it. But when I last checked, I guess it hadn't been open sourced yet. Being Latvian, I am skeptical of other Latvians, but in this case, I'm skeptical of running potentialy Kremlin aligned source.
  - layer8 2y ago
    At least some version of it has been open source for years: https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE
  - cookiengineer 2y ago
    For what it's worth, their server can be hosted on Windows and Linux, so somebody could make a Dockerfile for it. But yeah, in any case I'd double check for any log4j like known vulnerabilities. [1] https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/server/tree/8f4fd3383656602115abfd00a67c77aa6e5d46f9/Common/config https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/server/tree/8f4fd3383656602115...
  - vhhn 2y ago
    Latvian? I've always thought OnlyOffice is developed in Russia.
    - eptcyka 2y ago
      The headquarters are in Riga, but one would be forgiven to think it is an entirely Russian enterprise if one were to just look at their GitHub org.
dsp_person 2y ago
"Distraction Free Writing" with pic of rainy background - would be pretty if this is animated!
- Beijinger 2y ago
  Which one? Papyrus? Don't take this lightly, I tested a very old version (>10y) via Wine on Linux. This thing was fast as fuck. The scrolling.
gfoty 2y ago
[dead]

mr_toad 2y ago

> Later acquired by Sun if I remember correctly, then open sourced. Sun named it OpenOffice. LibreOffice was forked from OpenOffice after Oracle acquired Sun. OpenOffice was subsequently donated to the Apache foundation.

cookiengineer 2y ago
Note that this story is only half complete. Oracle stalled development, made the bugtrackers etc private, and kicked out all of the contributors and tried to commercialize the product at the time. The reason for Oracle "dumping" it to the Apache graveyard is that most of the "free" (as in unpaid) contributors switched sides to LibreOffice because of Oracle's hostile behavior towards the development community. And they donated OpenOffice because it was effectively a dead project for a couple of years. There's probably still some contributor talks about it on one of the old CCC conferences on their media server. If you want to learn about how to manage open source, Oracle's track record is a prime example of how not to.
- ozim 2y ago
  That’s the example how lawyers would manage open source.
- bee_rider 2y ago
  It is a shame that the OpenOffice name can’t be applied to LibreOffice. OpenOffice was a much better name, imo.
  - yellowapple 2y ago
    Now that it's in the Apache Foundation's hands, my hope is that OO and LO will make amends and merge back together, like what happened with OpenWRT and LEDE. Given how many years they've diverged that might not be possible from a technical standpoint, but at least from a branding standpoint it'd be an improvement.
- iforgotpassword 2y ago
  Isn't there strong beef between the remaining OO maintainers and the LO folks? It basically prevented LO from just being merged back into OO, instead we got that years-long confusion where non-tech people would download the horribly outdated OO and be like "wow this sucks imma go with MSO!"
  - cookiengineer 2y ago
    Yeah, I would assume that there's still beef between both parties, and I can kind of understand that. If you're getting a cease and desist letter because of some trademark bullshit for your open source forks... then I'd be pissed too. The way Oracle treated the developer community was pretty insane to be honest. Some links for others to read-up: Press Announcement for "Oracle Open Office" which wasn't open anymore: - https://web.archive.org/web/20101217212955/https://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/195766 https://web.archive.org/web/20101217212955/https://www.oracl... Oracle trying to upsell Standard Editions and Enterprise Editions: - https://web.archive.org/web/20100924092655/http://www.oracle.com/us/products/applications/open-office/open-office-170241.html https://web.archive.org/web/20100924092655/http://www.oracle... Announcement of the Document Foundation (Oct 2010, before Oracle's announcement in Dec 2010): - https://web.archive.org/web/20101001004543/http://www.documentfoundation.org/faq https://web.archive.org/web/20101001004543/http://www.docume... IBM being the reason that Oracle donates Open Office to Apache Foundation due to them pointing out to Oracle that their copyleft license agreement with Sun invalidates Oracle's proprietary claims: - https://web.archive.org/web/20131207051759/http://www.h-online.com/open/features/OpenOffice-splits-and-pirouettes-1270296.html https://web.archive.org/web/20131207051759/http://www.h-onli... - https://web.archive.org/web/20110603142320/http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/what-the-heck-is-happening-with-openoffice-update/9025 https://web.archive.org/web/20110603142320/http://www.zdnet....
johannes1234321 2y ago
> Sun named it OpenOffice. Slightly more correct: Sun kept StarOffice as a commercial offering and also open sourced it under the name of OpenOffice.org in parallel. The .org was quite important to them in the name. > LibreOffice was forked from OpenOffice after Oracle acquired Sun. The actual forking happens earlier with a patch set living outside Sun and sponsored by some Linux distros for a while. After Oracle's acquisition however the foundation was built and the name LibreOffice was picked.
- skissane 2y ago
  > The .org was quite important to them in the name. Apparently because, in some country in which Sun did business, someone else had already trademarked “OpenOffice”, but Sun’s lawyers believed the addition of “.org” was enough to sidestep that trademark. I think in many jurisdictions, if someone else already has legal claim to a trademark, sticking “.org” on the end may not be sufficient to escape infringement. But, maybe under the laws of whichever country this trademark existed in, it was. Or at least, so Sun’s lawyers believed-hence, they were quite insistent on including the “.org”
  - joshuaissac 2y ago
    It is owned by a Dutch company that offers automation services: https://web.archive.org/web/20130823152257/http://www.openoffice.nl/merkenregistratie https://web.archive.org/web/20130823152257/http://www.openof... Within Benelux, the company had an agreement with nl.openoffice.org where the latter would include a notice on their website to clarify that they were not affiliated with the trademark holder. According to https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1372955 https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1372955 it was also used by Orange UK, but that happened after OpenOffice.org was released: https://www.zdnet.com/home-and-office/networking/orange-launches-open-office/ https://www.zdnet.com/home-and-office/networking/orange-laun...
xvilka 2y ago
The problem is that Apache Foundation is being stubborn[1] to admit the OpenOffice death, which distracts and prevents users from using so much better software (LibreOffice) that harms an open source image and ecosystem in general. [1] https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2020/10/12/open-letter-to-apache-openoffice/ https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2020/10/12/open-let...
- mksaunders2 2y ago
  Yes, and now there are unfixed security issues in OpenOffice over a year old, so the ASF really, really should put it in the Attic ASAP. If more people in the FOSS world raise awareness about this, perhaps it will finally happen, so users become aware of maintained, fixed successor projects: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_OpenOffice#Security https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_OpenOffice#Security

cpill 2y ago

a 40yo code base. Eeeek!

chris_wot 2y ago
No, a 40 year old codebase with only 25 years of commit logs. And the initial commits during the Sun releases are insane - they took a bunch of commits, mashed them together and then added them as a single commit with a log message stating what all the commits they munged together did. Nightmare fuel. Excellent lately though.
- doubled112 2y ago
  Sounds like my personal git repos. God help us all if I ever need to share them, but I doubt it.
- ianburrell 2y ago
  The squished logs sounds like what Subversion does with merges. OpenOffice looks to have used Subversion for a while.
  - chris_wot 2y ago
    Yeah, I think they did something like this.
- mlyle 2y ago
  Honestly, though, looking more than 10 years back in revision control is usually only for curiosity. Whatever historical reasons existed for code to be a certain way are likely impenetrable or no longer relevant.
  - iforgotpassword 2y ago
    Nah, I've often found the opposite to be true. Granted, it requires proper commit messages and code comments, but I've had my fair share of "oooh I see" moments when I encountered nonsensical crazy code. Sometimes it reassured me that it could safely go, other times it revealed a whole new dimension nobody was really aware of anymore that then got a good chunk of comment space in the code base.

cookiengineer 2y ago

There's also onlyoffice [1] which recently got a little more traction due to its integrations for moodle, owncloud, nextcloud etc. I think all of their software is AGPL3 licensed last time I checked. Their suite somewhat targets selfhosted collaboration for the web browser. [1] https://www.onlyoffice.com/ https://www.onlyoffice.com/

eptcyka 2y ago
Has anyone audited/read their code. I found it very suspicous that a company as small as them would be able to deliver software as complex as it was on the face of it. But when I last checked, I guess it hadn't been open sourced yet. Being Latvian, I am skeptical of other Latvians, but in this case, I'm skeptical of running potentialy Kremlin aligned source.
- layer8 2y ago
  At least some version of it has been open source for years: https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE
- cookiengineer 2y ago
  For what it's worth, their server can be hosted on Windows and Linux, so somebody could make a Dockerfile for it. But yeah, in any case I'd double check for any log4j like known vulnerabilities. [1] https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/server/tree/8f4fd3383656602115abfd00a67c77aa6e5d46f9/Common/config https://github.com/ONLYOFFICE/server/tree/8f4fd3383656602115...
- vhhn 2y ago
  Latvian? I've always thought OnlyOffice is developed in Russia.
  - eptcyka 2y ago
    The headquarters are in Riga, but one would be forgiven to think it is an entirely Russian enterprise if one were to just look at their GitHub org.

dsp_person 2y ago

"Distraction Free Writing" with pic of rainy background - would be pretty if this is animated!

Beijinger 2y ago
Which one? Papyrus? Don't take this lightly, I tested a very old version (>10y) via Wine on Linux. This thing was fast as fuck. The scrolling.

gfoty 2y ago

[dead]