i think i agree about "if the math works out" -- but thats the hard question isnt it? isnt the accuracy of the poop test significant? if 2 or 3 poop tests incre

i think i agree about "if the math works out" -- but thats the hard question isnt it? isnt the accuracy of the poop test significant? if 2 or 3 poop tests increase our confidence in the result it changes the risk:benefit calculation for the colonoscopy or treatment. thats an easy win. but even if it did not, is the result from the (preventative) poop test less valid data than a patient complaining of pain? so generally speaking i agree we dont want to enable a path to risky procedures based on dubious evidence, but i think overall we are presently operating with a dearth of information (waiting for symptoms) and the math itself improves by having more proactive testing (information) in the first place