3 ms·
Sources?
by cglace 2y ago
Sources?
- bufferoverflow 2y agoSource of what specifically do you want? If you want the corruption they have found so far, the press secretary is doing daily briefings where she lists some of the insanity they have found. Trump's approval ratings are quite good, while Biden's are tanking as their corruption is uncovered.
- intended 2y agohttps://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/favorability/donald-trump/ https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/favorability/dona... Unfavorable rating of 48, vs favorable of 46. was this satire or sarcasm?
- bufferoverflow 2y ago[flagged]
- intended 2y ago>Trump's approval ratings are quite good, while Biden's are tanking as their corruption is uncovered. That is what you said. I addressed what you said. Trump's popularity is below his unpopularity. For a new sitting president. Biden's data goes only to the 20th, so its not dropping anymore. Since he isn't a president. The data source you may be quoting, seems to have set you up to make a conclusion, but not the argument.
- johnnyanmac 2y agowhy are we comparing the end of one president's term to the beginning (aka, the honyemon period) of another president. At least compare the first year February 13th, 2021: Unfavorable: 35% Favorable: 53% >Notice how favorability is increasing. Are we reading the same charts? Trump's Peak approval ratinig was 50% and is currently 49%. His nadir was 48.8%. It's a stretch to say it's moving either way. The only real data here is that his diaapproval rating is rising at the same point as Biden's first month (which is interestin, given that Biden came in at the height of COVID and his mandates really riled up red states. Trump has nothing to blame but himself)
- MoneyMeMoneyNow 2y agoWaving around printouts of screenshots and calling them receipts is hardly evidence. cor·rob·o·rate
- bufferoverflow 2y agoMoving the goal posts already. No amount of evidence will convince you.
- cglace 2y agoYou didn't produce evidence. You mentioned that the propaganda arm of the president said they found something.
- bufferoverflow 2y agoAs I said, "your evidence is not evidence" nonsense.
- cglace 2y agoHave you personally looked into the claims made by Leavitt during her briefings? It doesn't take much digging to see that they are much more nuanced than we are being led to believe.
- bufferoverflow 2y agoDemocrat's money laundering schemes at industrial scale. Of course your only argument "oh, it's nuanced". https://oversight.house.gov/release/hearing-wrap-up-doge-subcommittees-first-hearing-uncovers-billions-lost-to-fraud-and-improper-payments-launches-war-on-waste/ https://oversight.house.gov/release/hearing-wrap-up-doge-sub...
- buttercraft 2y agoAssertions made without any evidence. Again.
- cglace 2y agoOh ok. I forgot to check the approval ratings for evidence. Are these fraud findings as accurate as his hurricane trajectory map? I've been following Doge pretty closely and I see a lot of hand-waving but a lack of real evidence. Maybe I need to drink the cool aid first.
- johnnyanmac 2y ago>If you want the corruption they have found so far, the press secretary is doing daily briefings where she lists some of the insanity they have found. Okay: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/ https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/ >Readout of President Donald J. Trump’s Meeting with King Abdullah II of Jordan > Statement from the National Security Advisor [This is about Russia] >Presidential Message on Super Bowl LIX > United States-Japan Joint Leaders’ Statement >Statement from the Press Secretary on January’s Jobs Reports >Readout of President Donald J. Trump’s Call with President el-Sisi of Egypt So yeah, where are all these briefings of corruption? It's only been 3 weeks, so I didn't take long to exahaust all the briefings. None of them talked about DOGE