4 ms·
It's all over X, including from the official DOGE account. Here's a couple: On the morning of 2/3/25, 20 consulting contracts, mostly focused on "strategic co
by lowkey_ 2y ago
It's all over X, including from the official DOGE account.
Here's a couple:
On the morning of 2/3/25, 20 consulting contracts, mostly focused on "strategic communication" and "executive coaching," were terminated for immediate savings of $26mm.
On 2/10/25, the Department of Education terminated 89 contracts worth $881mm. One contractor was paid $1.5mm to "observe mailing and clerical operations at a mail center."
These things take months to years, and I don't believe we'll see fraud cases when it's been less than a month since the DOGE operation has started. If it's not fraud, it's grossly negligent with taxpayer money (which is not a crime), but I would bet at least a few of those sketchy contracts were with friends and former colleagues of the government bureaucrats in question.
- mmcwilliams 2y agoSo your evidence of fraud includes contracts that were not provably fraudulent and just things you deem unnecessary? And it's your "bet" that these were "sketchy"? Is there a law against friends and former colleagues of government officials getting contracts? I imagine that would create several problems for the current administration.