3 ms·
Anthropic is ridiculously expensive compared to (not at all)OpenAI. I pay $50 a month to a OpenAI while I spent $50 in a day with Anthropic during a coding sess
by Roark66 2y ago
Anthropic is ridiculously expensive compared to (not at all)OpenAI. I pay $50 a month to a OpenAI while I spent $50 in a day with Anthropic during a coding session. Was Claude better than Chatgpt 4 at certain tasks? Sure, it was also worse on some.
I've been saying (not at all)Open AI are subsidising the costs of running the models.The moment we get really dependent on them, they'll hike the prices.!
- ashu1461 2y agoPrices are only going to go down, Gemini Flash is dirt cheap as compared to GPT 4o mini, and soon Open AI will also hopefully bring prices further down. They will keep prices high for tech like O3 which is leading the market but probably it will also come down as competition arises and their infra also gets optimised.
- maeil 2y agoIt's not when you compare it to the right thing. > Was Claude better than Chatgpt 4 at certain tasks? Sure, it was also worse on some. For simple question/answer things, sure, but then you might as well use Gemini. For price-conscious personal use, its range of models are easily the best option, especially given the generous free tier. 4o-08 is much worse at following instructions and especially using tools intelligently than Sonnet3.5, it's not close. If for you the money isn't worth it, great, but there's a good reason why pretty much every single LLM-based tool is built on top of Sonnet instead of gpt-4o despite it being more expensive - clearly it's worth it. Those tools would love nothing more than to save costs by going with cheaper models.