3 ms·
You're being misleading. You're including money that the government pays out in social security which is a retirement program and really nothing to do with gove
by dkjaudyeqooe 2y ago
You're being misleading. You're including money that the government pays out in social security which is a retirement program and really nothing to do with government except that it's mandated. Ditto for health programs. In the absence of these programs insurance and investment companies would be doing the same.
The real difference is how governments involve themselves in the day to day of the economy and that has to do with regulation and other government interventions.
Small government is mostly ideological dogma since it makes no reference to what government is doing for you. Who wants a "small government" that provides no services to taxpayers?
It's amazing, and quite stupid, that the discussion seems to be so much about the size of government rather than what people are getting for their money and if it is worth the cost.
- roenxi 2y agoAll money the government pays out goes towards someone's lifestyle; objects don't use cash. I'm not sure what your complaint is there. The government paying someone to sit there and do nothing in retirement is at least as governmenty as paying someone to fill in holes in a road, for example. > Who wants a "small government" that provides no services to taxpayers? The people who are saying "I want a small government". That is what a small government is. A small government is one that doesn't do very much and that test is how you can tell the US government isn't one.