3 ms·
If it has already been established that open source doesn't mean open assets, why would we change that now? After all, training data is literally nothing but as
by sigmoid10 2y ago
If it has already been established that open source doesn't mean open assets, why would we change that now? After all, training data is literally nothing but assets - except that you don't need them to run the application. So in that sense open LLMs are more open than these games.
- GeneralMayhem 2y agoBut the training data isn't open... I agree that open source doesn't mean open assets, but neither does open assets mean open source. You could make a linguistic argument that the training data is part of the "source" of the model (as in, from whence it came), but in any case the point is moot because neither the training data nor the code is open.