>>> Gay activists is a more appropriate term. What is Focus on the Family? Or the Family Research Council? Eagle Forum? >>> And many people might agree with

>>> Gay activists is a more appropriate term. What is Focus on the Family? Or the Family Research Council? Eagle Forum? >>> And many people might agree with you they are "big meanies" looking for a fight. They are "looking for a fight" to be fought in the public square, in legislatures and courts, over what many of them consider to be a legal injustice. Is this not the intended form of democracy? >>> As far as funding campaigns that support their moral views as a "private" company, why is that so bothersome? Why is it so bothersome to point this fact out? If they do not wish to be injured by the information, then they have the power to make it false. >>> They don't get out in front of a microphone in the public media and state this fact every time they get the chance. The fact they were (previously) not very vocal about their views negates them how? >>> Although Bezos seems to think this is a good idea. As is his right? Just like the Cathy family has the same right? >>> Gay right=Civil right=Yeah right Disagreement does not require a dismissive attitude. I could just as easily denigrate your opinions and your position, but that benefits no one.