I appreciate how well written and easy to follow this is! That said, I’m not really sure I understand the issue here. It seems like Deepseek is able to suggest

I appreciate how well written and easy to follow this is! That said, I’m not really sure I understand the issue here. It seems like Deepseek is able to suggest things, but acknowledges they’re dangerous and bad and shouldn’t be done. That seems in line with humans, where we can all think about things we could do if we ignored laws/norms but hopefully acknowledge we shouldn’t do those things. I’m not really sure I see much value in a model pretending it can’t think of a way for an AI to do bad things, when its training obviously gives it that knowledge.