4 ms·
> it isn't a big deal? friend you shouldn't make comments like this unless you understand the definitions of the words. Deepseek wrote some parts of their kern
by almostgotcaught 2y ago
> it isn't a big deal?
friend you shouldn't make comments like this unless you understand the definitions of the words. Deepseek wrote some parts of their kernels using PTX. newsflash: PTX support for features is lockstep with CUDA support for the same features ie the fact that CUDA doesn't support it means you couldn't write the PTX to use those features either.
- therealfiona 2y agoIt is poor form to condemn someone from asking a question. Thank you for providing the information to clear up ignorance though.
- almostgotcaught 2y agothis is a question: > is deepseak's use of PTX instead of CUDA relevant here? this is a conclusion/assumption thinly veiled as a question > Deepseek R1 doesn't use CUDA, so ... it isn't a big deal? note, genuine questions don't already presuppose an answer.
- GTP 2y agoAsking if it is a big deal or not is definitely a question ;) Thank you for providing the information I was missing though.