3 ms·
I think WASM is misfortune because for most websites (forget backend for a moment!), anything it can do can be done better and faster using as JS and server sid
by aqueueaqueue 2y ago
I think WASM is misfortune because for most websites (forget backend for a moment!), anything it can do can be done better and faster using as JS and server side split. JS gets heavily optimised by V8. And add in the download time for the WASM and the learning curve and it isn't too attractive.
It needs something to make it a must have for some area of adoption. I just don't see it yet.