It could be - the master list is protected, but Reuters.com doesn't have a good reputation. See [1] for an example of confusing Reuters.com with material actua

It could be - the master list is protected, but Reuters.com doesn't have a good reputation. See [1] for an example of confusing Reuters.com with material actually produced by the Reuters news agency that owns it. [1] http://www.cracked.com/quick-fixes/fluoride-lowers-your-iq-b.s.-headline-week/ http://www.cracked.com/quick-fixes/fluoride-lowers-your-iq-b... (And yes, I love the irony of using an article from one banned website to explain the banning of another!)