4 ms·
Regarding point 3 the major point of reducing the civil service is that the service they're providing is not required or can be done far more efficiently with t
by emmelaich 2y ago
Regarding point 3 the major point of reducing the civil service is that the service they're providing is not required or can be done far more efficiently with the private sector.
You can say this claim will be wrong but it's odd at the very least to ignore it.
- ben_w 2y agoThey appear to be interested in monetary flow, for which such questions are irrelevant. Even if the top level suggestion of 2 trillion eliminated fell entirely on people providing zero economic output (i.e. the cuts consisted of completely eliminating social security and all military/veteran pensions), and thus the private sector has no desire to absorb them at step 1, and consequently 2 and 3 didn't apply at all, the private sector still looses that much in revenue.