25 ms·

Sounds like something ready for the mass population.

• steveklabnik 2y ago
  It is true that if you're looking for a finished, polished product, jj is very much not that. It's pre-1.0. Lots of things will change. I still refuse to use anything else these days, but I can understand why someone else might not want to.
• aidenn0 2y ago
  This was true of svn and git; both had command named the same as VCSs that were popular when they were introduced, but had semantics that were subtly (or not so subtly) different.
• KingMob 2y ago
  Unironically, it is. The underlying storage engine is git, which is rock-solid. But to put it this way, I've been using jj for almost a year, and even without a 1.0 release, editor support, or mature tooling, it's still such an improvement over git, I've stopped using git 98% of the time.