2 ms·
Not mentioned at all is the failure rate, which back in May was reported by Ars to be 85% with the first patient, Noland. [1] [1] https://arstechnica.com/scien
by hexator 2y ago
Not mentioned at all is the failure rate, which back in May was reported by Ars to be 85% with the first patient, Noland. [1]
[1] https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/05/neuralink-to-implant-2nd-human-with-brain-chip-as-75-of-threads-retract-in-1st/ https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/05/neuralink-to-implant...
- OsrsNeedsf2P 2y agoThis is 85% of the threads in the device failed, yet it was allegedly mitigated after a software update, and usage of Neurolink continued to climb for the patient, suggesting the device is still functional
- InDubioProRubio 2y agoWhat about the scar tissue those implants generate? How did they avoid that?