> Additionally, you performed mental gymnastics to use the the terms […] "private party" in place of the "The United States". "private party" in their comment

> Additionally, you performed mental gymnastics to use the the terms […] "private party" in place of the "The United States". "private party" in their comment likely refers to the plaintiff in the case, "Doctors for America", which is a private party. But I agree with you, though: of course the plaintiff is a private party. Who else would it be, when the government is violating the Constitution? Is upthread expecting the government to sue itself?