"A judge is dictating the contents of an agency site, at the behest of a private party." No, a judge is undoing an executive order from a federal agency that d

"A judge is dictating the contents of an agency site, at the behest of a private party." No, a judge is undoing an executive order from a federal agency that did not pass judicial scrutinty for legalitybased on 200+ years of judicial framework and precidence. Nothing to do with information, politics, etc. this is exactly what the framework of the constitution allows for and happens dozens of times a day every day in every locale. Additionally, you performed mental gymnastics to use the the terms "Agency Site" in place of the term "Agency Operating under the Executive Privilege of the Federal Government" and "private party" in place of the "The United States". This is IMO very cut and dry, will get very little media coverage, and I struggle to think how one falls on "This looks good for person X".