You can read the ruling here: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69608613/12/doctors-for-america-v-office-of-personnel-management/ https://www.courtlistener.c

You can read the ruling here: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69608613/12/doctors-for-america-v-office-of-personnel-management/ https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69608613/12/doctors-for... It is quite detailed. There are at least two laws in question. One specifically says that the government must '"provide adequate notice when initiating, substantially modifying, or terminating significant information dissemination products,” which HHS defines to include electronic documents and webpages.' (quoting the ruling, which quotes the law) Clearly the government did not do this. The other is the Administrative Procedures Act, which forbids arbitrary and capricious actions by agencies. Also, if you think the "optics" of this are good, consider whether you want your doctor wasting time trying to find an alternative resource instead of practicing medicine.