> Of course both these assumptions are wrong, the quality of code produced by AI will improve dramatically as model evolves. This is the fundamental delusion t

> Of course both these assumptions are wrong, the quality of code produced by AI will improve dramatically as model evolves. This is the fundamental delusion that is driving AI hype. Although scale has made LLMs look like magic, actual magic (AGI) is not on the scaling path. This is a conjecture (as is the converse), but I'm betting the farm on it personally and see LLMs as useful chat bots that augment other, better technologies for automation. If you want to pursue AGI, move on quickly to something structurally and fundamentally better. People don't understand that AGI is pure speculation. There is no rigorous, non-circular definition of human intelligence, let alone proof that AGI is possible or achievable in any reasonable time frame (like 100 years).