3 ms·
And if the new tech is beneficial and adds enough value that it makes it worth replacing the old tech, then by all means go for it. However, I can't count many
by hylaride 2y ago
And if the new tech is beneficial and adds enough value that it makes it worth replacing the old tech, then by all means go for it.
However, I can't count many companies I've seen decide to get into "the cloud" only to do lift-and-shifts and are now running their stack in slower and more expensive ways.
There's a reason this youtube video exists and it's because people get into hype and then are saddled with technical debt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2F-DItXtZs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b2F-DItXtZs
Over the last decade I worked for a fintech that did analytics for the investment banking industry and between 2016-2020 the amount of people that were shocked we weren't trying to shove blockchain somewhere was surreal.
- whstl 2y agoI totally agree with you, but it’s funny that you use the cloud as the non-boring example here. I’m pretty sure the majority of HN thinks that even hosting directly on EC2 is for NIH adventurers only.
- hylaride 2y agoYeah, it was an example for when it was fashionable.
- teemur 2y agoOh, that video brought memories. I wonder if there is any good content about low code fallacy or cloud?