4 ms·
Ah ok. I agree with you. The prevalence of Steppe Ancestry in all modern day Indians should be enough to conclude that some form of migration happened. All t
by FlyingSnake 2y ago
Ah ok. I agree with you.
The prevalence of Steppe Ancestry in all modern day Indians should be enough to conclude that some form of migration happened.
All this politically tinged talk about supposed purity of DNA is utter nonsense.
- kragen 2y agoDo we know it's steppe ancestry because of DNA comparisons with Kurgan grave DNA, or from some other evidence? To me it seems a priori difficult to know where a gene hails from originally.
- wqaatwt 2y agoIf in earlier periods a specific haplogroup is concentrated in specific relatively small area but after a couple of centuries it can be found across the entire continent that seems like a good indicator.
- kragen 2y agoThat's why I was asking if this conclusion is based on grave DNA data. How else do you know where haplogroups were in earlier periods, other than by already knowing the information about historical migrations and population replacements that we're trying to derive in the first place?
- FlyingSnake 2y agoThat’s a great question but I don’t know how this gene flow worked. I’m not an expert in genetics but genetic research shows that one component of Indian DNA matches with Steppe Pastorals. Here’s an article that goes deeper into this: https://eruditus.substack.com/p/sons-of-the-indus-the-indians https://eruditus.substack.com/p/sons-of-the-indus-the-indian...
- kragen 2y agoThank you, this is fantastic!