3 ms·
LTS makes sense for services with a finite lifecycle that are meant to be replaced at EOL, not upgraded.
by synack 2y ago
LTS makes sense for services with a finite lifecycle that are meant to be replaced at EOL, not upgraded.
- stouset 2y agoI can agree with this.
- SahAssar 2y agoHow often do you know that that far ahead? If someone asked me to guarantee that a service will be replaced in 4 years that'd be hard. Ask me about 12 years and it's basically impossible.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- notatoad 2y agoif it's a project for your employer that you have staff in charge of maintaining, then it's probably a bad choice. but for projects delivered by contractors who provide a fixed service and maintenance term, it's reasonable to provide a fixed end date for the project as a whole, and that's probably less than 12 years.