3 ms·
I feel the same way about SQL too, it's set and difficult to shift. But I also look at PRQL longingly - https://prql-lang.org/ https://prql-lang.org/
by dv_dt 2y ago
I feel the same way about SQL too, it's set and difficult to shift. But I also look at PRQL longingly - https://prql-lang.org/ https://prql-lang.org/
- nightpool 2y agoHave you seen the Google BQ pipe syntax? https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/reference/standard-sql/pipe-syntax https://cloud.google.com/bigquery/docs/reference/standard-sq... Feels like it does 75% of what PRQL does while still staying somewhat backwards compatible. Already works in BQ if you opt in.