4 ms·
What you just described is magnitudes slower than even conventional hash tables
by internetter 2y ago
What you just described is magnitudes slower than even conventional hash tables
- doublerabbit 2y agoI'd like to see your solution.
- internetter 2y agoMy solution would be a conventional hash table. Now, I will consider using the solution defined in the paper.
- doublerabbit 2y agoYeah? Not for me. I prefer my way of things. More fun and learning.