4 ms·

Statement from Dario Amodei on the Paris AI Action Summit

7 points by Philpax 2y ago

Philpax 2y ago
> Time is short, and we must accelerate our actions to match accelerating AI progress. Possibly by 2026 or 2027 (and almost certainly no later than 2030), the capabilities of AI systems will be best thought of as akin to an entirely new state populated by highly intelligent people appearing on the global stage—a “country of geniuses in a datacenter”—with the profound economic, societal, and security implications that would bring.
WiSaGaN 2y ago
I think the current US administration significantly undermines the framing of democracy versus authoritarianism. As much as Dario may want to push alternative narratives, most AI practitioners—who have no financial ties to OpenAI or Anthropic—likely view this as an attempt to squash competition from open weight models.
- blackeyeblitzar 2y ago
  How does the US administration undermine the framing of democracy versus authoritarianism? They were democratically elected. Their actions have at least a simple majority of support among voters according to polls. The US still has all the fundamentals of a democracy such as free speech, and strong individual rights in the first and second and other amendments. People aren’t getting tossed out of windows or sent to labor camps or controlled by social credit scores. In my opinion, there is no equivalency between America (whether under Biden or Trump) and an authoritarian regime like in Russia or China.
blackeyeblitzar 2y ago
> First, we must ensure democratic societies lead in AI, and that authoritarian countries do not use it to establish global military dominance. One of the problems is that authoritarian countries already have access to this technology. All the open sharing of research and weights and free trade that allowed access to GPUs already happened. What now? Isn’t it inevitable that those authoritarian countries will use these technologies to control their citizens, improve their military tech, and undermine democratic countries?

7 points by Philpax 2y ago

> Time is short, and we must accelerate our actions to match accelerating AI progress. Possibly by 2026 or 2027 (and almost certainly no later than 2030), the capabilities of AI systems will be best thought of as akin to an entirely new state populated by highly intelligent people appearing on the global stage—a “country of geniuses in a datacenter”—with the profound economic, societal, and security implications that would bring.

WiSaGaN 2y ago

I think the current US administration significantly undermines the framing of democracy versus authoritarianism. As much as Dario may want to push alternative narratives, most AI practitioners—who have no financial ties to OpenAI or Anthropic—likely view this as an attempt to squash competition from open weight models.

blackeyeblitzar 2y ago
How does the US administration undermine the framing of democracy versus authoritarianism? They were democratically elected. Their actions have at least a simple majority of support among voters according to polls. The US still has all the fundamentals of a democracy such as free speech, and strong individual rights in the first and second and other amendments. People aren’t getting tossed out of windows or sent to labor camps or controlled by social credit scores. In my opinion, there is no equivalency between America (whether under Biden or Trump) and an authoritarian regime like in Russia or China.

blackeyeblitzar 2y ago

> First, we must ensure democratic societies lead in AI, and that authoritarian countries do not use it to establish global military dominance. One of the problems is that authoritarian countries already have access to this technology. All the open sharing of research and weights and free trade that allowed access to GPUs already happened. What now? Isn’t it inevitable that those authoritarian countries will use these technologies to control their citizens, improve their military tech, and undermine democratic countries?