3 ms·
Yep, hybrid works best for me too. Being at home 100% of the time works if I have perfectly clear tasks and deadlines. But as soon as there's something that re
by theshrike79 2y ago
Yep, hybrid works best for me too.
Being at home 100% of the time works if I have perfectly clear tasks and deadlines. But as soon as there's something that requires collaboration with multiple people it's just SO MUCH EASIER to do it in person with everyone physically in the same room.
Zoom is good and all, but it's always janky the more people are in the meeting.
On site you can get more of the subtle hints off of people and the conversation flows better when you can talk over each other without the software deciding whose voice gets through.
Then you make the decisions you need and can hole up in your comfy home office for a while before needing to emerge again to collaborate.
- rubslopes 2y ago> Zoom is good and all, but it's always janky the more people are in the meeting. It's the little things, isn't it? Like when someone starts talking one second before you finish and you can't hear them, and then you ask them to repeat, and there's some lag, and you are not sure if they really said something or it was a glitch... Then you lose 20 seconds doing the "did you say something? No no, it was my cat passing by" and everyone lost focus.
- theshrike79 2y agoOr people on site talking with each other and not noticing the raised hand of someone online. All this can be mitigated with processes, but it takes conscious work to keep it up.