3 ms·
Civ 2 was great. I mostly skipped 3 and completely skipped 4, but have played 5 a fair bit through the years and still feel that Civ 2 was better. Not graphic
by lupusreal 2y ago
Civ 2 was great. I mostly skipped 3 and completely skipped 4, but have played 5 a fair bit through the years and still feel that Civ 2 was better. Not graphically, obviously, but the game mechanics evolved relatively little from 2 to 5 and in some cases not for the better (unit stacking??) Worse, Civ 5 games all turn out smaller and shorter than what I used to do in 2. Fewer cities, fewer units, smaller and shorter wars. Pity it's such a pain in the ass to run Civ 2 these days.
- newsclues 2y agoI loved the Civ II world war 2 scenario, I played that more than anything else.
- tetha 2y agoWine runs Civ 2 very nicely these days. It's just a desktop shortcut away for me. All in all it's pretty funny to me how a lot of games from the Win98ish era are now easier to run on Linux than on Windows.