3 ms·
It simply means that, for their purposes, React wasn't good enough. Personally, I applaud any effort that doesn't use React.
by hnlurker22 2y ago
It simply means that, for their purposes, React wasn't good enough. Personally, I applaud any effort that doesn't use React.
- hnlurker22 2y ago>We had some very good reasons to do it: a team of strong Go engineers; a complex UI that TypeScript/React didn't scale well for
- yieldcrv 2y agoBecause its a bullshit assessment, they ran into the same limitations in their obscure choice, they didn’t move fast and break things, and both choices have optimizations to deal with these problems and we would all fail system design interviews for considering the same thing
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- zero_shift 2y ago> Personally, I applaud any effort that doesn't use React. Why?
- hnlurker22 2y agoThere needs to be competition