3 ms·
> I ask the question, what is 2 * 2, which is an obviously loaded question that's pattern matched to death. Yeah, that was my point. Small codomain -> easy to
by daveguy 2y ago
> I ask the question, what is 2 * 2, which is an obviously loaded question that's pattern matched to death.
Yeah, that was my point. Small codomain -> easy to validate. Large codomain -> open to interpretation. You implied that to prove reasoning, pick a prompt with a large codomain and if the LLM answers with accurate precision, then viola, reasoning.
So my question was, can you give an example of a prompt with a high codomain that isn't subject to wide interpretation? It seems the wider the codomain the easier it is to say, "look! reasoning!"
- ninetyninenine 2y agoPick a prompt with a wide codomain but a single answer. That’s reasoning if it can get the answer right.
- daveguy 2y agoYour original claim was that an LLM can reason. And you say it can be proven by picking one of these prompts with a large codomain that has a precise answer which requires reason. If an LLM can come to a specific answer out of a huge codomain, and that answer requires reason, you claim that proves reasoning. Do I have that right? So my question is, and has been these three replies: Can you give any example of one of these prompts?
- ninetyninenine 2y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43011839 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43011839
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]