4 ms·
The dems outspent republicans by a billion or so, so 250M didn't do much. If it did, Kamala would've won by a lot. https://www.axios.com/2024/10/31/democrats-r
by ivewonyoung 2y ago
The dems outspent republicans by a billion or so, so 250M didn't do much. If it did, Kamala would've won by a lot.
https://www.axios.com/2024/10/31/democrats-republicans-ad-spending-election-day https://www.axios.com/2024/10/31/democrats-republicans-ad-sp...
Way more billionaires supported Kamala vs. Trump (83 vs 52).
- johnnyanmac 2y agoI'm assuming whatever spending advantadge Dems had was more or less squandered the moment those billionaires got cold feet and decided to oust Joe Biden instead of relying on the incumbent vote. That disruption very likely scared off several donors. But yes, there was also simply a lack of energy in the D voter base in 2024. No amount of spending can recover disengaged voters who simply dismissed everyone as "equally bad".
- pjc50 2y agoDem handling of the Palestine situation went extremely badly for them.
- neoromantique 2y agoThere was no good way to handle it, Pro-Palestinian propaganda was very active, to a significantly larger extent than it is now.
- theGnuMe 2y agoRussia probably played a role in that.
- cma 2y agoThey spent it running ads and stuff, Musk went ahead against the taboo and legalnrestrictions against buying votes/voter registeration and did a million dollar a day lottery for registered republicans in a swing state.