2 ms·
If they had a reputation for committing those homicides in Europe, that seems sensible. As stated though, it would be a big waste of their time. I mean, they ar
by xp84 2y ago
If they had a reputation for committing those homicides in Europe, that seems sensible. As stated though, it would be a big waste of their time. I mean, they are free to do their own risk assessments and run their security as they see fit either way, though.
If you really believe the public is kept safe most effectively by pretending to be fully blind to nationality when choosing who to screen at an airport (since you can't intensively screen everyone) I don't know what to tell you.
Although it's interesting that the same people who would take that position seem to also argue that colorblindness is actually a sin if it's done while processing a college application.
- selimthegrim 2y agoYou are aware that people from US states with no history of foreign travel have self-radicalized, right?
- BeetleB 2y ago> If they had a reputation for committing those homicides in Europe, that seems sensible. Reputation? Are we deciding security policies by reputation or statistics? I think I'd win the bet of "Americans have killed more people (per capita) in other countries than Saudis have", so it does seem relevant to be more wary of them. Especially given how widespread the former has been, compared to a few incidents with the latter. > If you really believe ... I don't know what to tell you. That does seem evident, yes. > Although it's interesting that the same people who would take that position seem to also argue that colorblindness is actually a sin if it's done while processing a college application. Citation?