3 ms·
Here is what Marilyn vos Savant had to say: > So let’s look at it again, remembering that the original answer defines certain conditions, the most significant
by ryao 2y ago
Here is what Marilyn vos Savant had to say:
> So let’s look at it again, remembering that the original answer defines certain conditions, the most significant of which is that the host always opens a losing door on purpose. (There’s no way he can always open a losing door by chance!) Anything else is a different question.
https://web.archive.org/web/20130121183432/http://marilynvossavant.com/game-show-problem/ https://web.archive.org/web/20130121183432/http://marilynvos...
What you are discussing is a different problem.
- toast0 2y agoSure, the answer to the question states that the host always opens a losing door. The question does not state that. It's an assumption that was made in the answering. If that's a premise, then yes, always switch. If you only go by the question, there's not enough information.
- ryao 2y agoThat was how everyone interpreted the original column (according to thousands of letters sent to Marilyn vos Savant), and it was made explicit in a clarification made in a follow up to the column. What you are discussing is a different problem.