2 ms·
To be frank it seems like you’re the one doing the willful misinterpretation. The purpose was to make a statement that asking a journalist for a retraction is s
by mcmcmc 2y ago
To be frank it seems like you’re the one doing the willful misinterpretation. The purpose was to make a statement that asking a journalist for a retraction is serious business with legal implications, and doing so flippantly is a good way to get dunked on.
The CEO bringing up solvency before claiming that “banks don’t get closed for [BSA findings]” implied that banks not suffering from insolvency don’t get shut down, which is throughly debunked with several examples.