3 ms·

LOL no. it is super fluffy. Lots of good stuff in there, but just overly verbose.

• kristianp 2y ago
  I wish he would learn to make less digressions. I'm currently reading through "debanking and debunking" [1] and the whole part about Silvergate is interesting, but really long. It is relevant, but he goes into full detail about it. Other writers would put that into a separate article. I have limited time to read about these things, maybe 15 minutes max and his articles are often hour-long reads. [1] https://www.bitsaboutmoney.com/archive/debanking-and-debunking/ https://www.bitsaboutmoney.com/archive/debanking-and-debunki...
  • casenmgreen 2y ago
    Tolkien wrote of LoTR that he received endless mail from readers, and for every part of the story, to some it was especially wonderful, others especially poor.
  • HeyLaughingBoy 2y ago
    That's actually my only problem with Patrick's articles. I flag them for "read later" and then a month later I still haven't read them because I know how much time I need to set aside.
  • cyanydeez 2y ago
    He swerves in and out of liberal ideology saying "it could happen, but it's not currently; it could happen, but it's not some global conspiracy" He lost me in the digressions to the facts. I agree he presented facts but he really seems like he's trying to scratch the debanking itch while just saying it hasn't happened yet and if it does happen it's because you're electing liberals (again). I appreciate people who respond deeply to facts, but can find fault in the examples he finds to justify the paranoid he's apparently trying to quell.
  • mixmastamyk 2y ago
    Lordy... I followed a link from that to his vaccine website project. Whole morning, gone.