4 ms·

I'm not offended hehe. I like small processes, and am into language learning, so my bias is showing. I think how things are, with most supporting --help, but no

I'm not offended hehe. I like small processes, and am into language learning, so my bias is showing. I think how things are, with most supporting --help, but not all, makes sense. I think what some are going for perhaps is that all programs to be run in the shell support --help. I think it could be normalized further by having a shell function get help for a command. For most it could pass --help, but it could handle the exceptions. So instead of running "foo --help" you could run "help foo", and it would run "foo --help" or "foo -h" or whatever, and it would be like man except instead of meaning show a manual page it could mean ask a program to document itself.

Arnavion 2y ago
>I think it could be normalized further by having a shell function get help for a command. See PowerShell commandlets for a related precedent: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/scripting/developer/help/examples-of-comment-based-help?view=powershell-7.5 https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/powershell/scripting/devel... Commandlets (shell functions) can annotate themselves and their parameters in a standard way, and then the shell's builtin help command parses that and presents it in a standard way. Though unfortunately this kind of integration only works for the commandlets, not arbitrary executables, because there's no standard for executables to expose such metadata to the shell.