That project is so "ambitious" I think it's more responsible to call it "wishful thinking" for these reasons: 1. We haven't been able to sustain a fusion react

That project is so "ambitious" I think it's more responsible to call it "wishful thinking" for these reasons: 1. We haven't been able to sustain a fusion reaction for longer than 1,000 seconds, just a little over 15 minutes. 2. These are research reactors. Scaling-up these reactors to commercial output may not be straightforward and may require considerably more research. 3. These reactors require tritium, which is not exactly abundant, and requires its own technological advancements in order to scale-up production to satisfy commercial needs. The project's "ambitious goals" is to hit 2030s? I'll be surprised if they hit their goals in the 2040s and even if they do - that's not a scale-out. You're talking another 10-20 years after that in order to have meaningful impact. That puts you in the 2050s or 2060s at the earliest. Using those more realistic timelines it's clear there's a high probability that the AMOC is going to shut down. So high a probability that it would be prudent to plan on it.