4 ms·
No, advances in efficiency were always expected (and indeed required because of this 'law') The principle is that if DeepSeek had have spent 10 or 100 times as
by Lerc 2y ago
No, advances in efficiency were always expected (and indeed required because of this 'law')
The principle is that if DeepSeek had have spent 10 or 100 times as much as they did their model would have been a few times better.
This rule is intended to be applied on top of all of the other advances.
- mvdtnz 2y ago> The principle is that if DeepSeek had have spent 10 or 100 times as much as they did their model would have been a few times better. If this is the case then OpenAI must have a model that is a few times better. Where is it?
- Lerc 2y agoIf they have one I presume it would be in one of their data centres. Are you implying that they might be hiding something by not releasing a new model based upon technology that's a month old?