4 ms·
This is a nice run through of some pitfalls. I'd love to see an accompanying "how to make a great architecture diagram", I think the purpose behind these diagra
by benrutter 2y ago
This is a nice run through of some pitfalls. I'd love to see an accompanying "how to make a great architecture diagram", I think the purpose behind these diagrams often gets lost (or was bad to start with) and as a result I've seen (and probably produced) a lot of unhelpful architecture diagrams.
Being cynical, I've seen some that clearly attempt to overcomplicate things in order to convey something along the lines of "look at all this complexity we're managing, aren't we great?". Might be useful for getting your team some additional credit, but less helpful in a few years time when somebody is trying to use the diagram to figure out the underlying structure of things.
- ffsm8 2y ago> Might be useful for getting your team some additional credit, but less helpful in a few years time when somebody is trying to use the diagram to figure out the underlying structure of things. I'm pretty sure people that aim for the former actually like the latter too
- billyp-rva 2y ago> This is a nice run through of some pitfalls. I'd love to see an accompanying "how to make a great architecture diagram", I think the purpose behind these diagrams often gets lost (or was bad to start with) and as a result I've seen (and probably produced) a lot of unhelpful architecture diagrams. Naturally I think you'd go a long way just avoiding these pitfalls and doing the reverse (e.g. label your arrows). For a somewhat different perspective on making good diagrams by reducing their complexity, I wrote on this just last month: [0] https://www.ilograph.com/blog/posts/breaking-up-the-master-diagram/ https://www.ilograph.com/blog/posts/breaking-up-the-master-d...