> From my understanding facial reconstruction from skulls is a well-defined process in forensics It's commonly used, but is it: * Consistent from practitioner

> From my understanding facial reconstruction from skulls is a well-defined process in forensics It's commonly used, but is it: * Consistent from practitioner to practitioner? * Able to consistently pass a double-blind test? My understanding of forensic 'science' is that it has a bad reputation for having more in common with shamanism, or the rituals of a witchdoctor, than it does with science.