5 ms·
Am curious. How is this raw HTML if you're using markdown? But on the other side, writing in raw HTML is a fascinating topic I've been very intrigued by. http:
by unsungNovelty 2y ago
Am curious. How is this raw HTML if you're using markdown?
But on the other side, writing in raw HTML is a fascinating topic I've been very intrigued by. http://john.ankarstrom.se/html/ http://john.ankarstrom.se/html/ is a very inspiring post.
- lmm 2y agoI write my blog in markdown and serve it to the browser as such, with a one-liner javascript include to render it in browsers that support that. I like that the "canonical" post source is preserved and served (you can read it with telnet, in a pinch).
- trog 2y agoYeh but do you say you write your blog in markdown or 'raw HTML'?
- flas9sd 2y agohad a look and I like it. More "raw markdown" (what the OP uses too) instead of HTML in web publishing is a good thing - basically because xml syntax is not how humans want to write. This, combined with git forges pages concept or tilde user accounts makes for nice corners in the webs.
- rchaud 2y agoSure, but writing in Markdown isn't how humans write either.
- lmm 2y agoMarkdown is the least bad way for humans to write, IME. It definitely beats handwriting, it definitely beats every other markup/formatting language, and subjectively I find it nicer than MS Word style "WYSIWYG" formatting although that part is maybe more arguable.