>explains the otherwise perplexing fact that laborsaving machinery fails to benefit workers I disagree, the reason why workers don’t benefit is because they ar

>explains the otherwise perplexing fact that laborsaving machinery fails to benefit workers I disagree, the reason why workers don’t benefit is because they are mostly paid to put hours in. Owners claim the gains of better machinery because they reason it is a capital investment at the business level. Really I don’t see why see why this is perplexing. What is really perplexing is that some economists thought that productivity gains would somehow accrue gains for workers.