3 ms·
> This is irrelevant to this discussion. It is relevant because it shows not just a symbiosis, but a mixing of the two groups where they are effectively the sa
by trod1234 2y ago
> This is irrelevant to this discussion.
It is relevant because it shows not just a symbiosis, but a mixing of the two groups where they are effectively the same group. Its important context.
> How will patriotism help if both sides of the political spectrum believe they're the "true" patriots and that the other side are traitors who seek to destroy their way of life.
Belief alone is worthless, you can believe something is true and in the face of objective truth know it is not. The thing that matters is whether reality shows its true or not. The requires objective measure, something ideology alone does not have but rationalism does.
> Riiight. Who decides who the "true" citizens are?
Unlike communism, and socialism, there is no decision from a central authority who the true citizens are. It comes down to objective reality and whether your actions show conformance to the founding father's principles.
These are Faith, Freedom, Self-sufficiency, Independence, and no taxation without legitimate representation, which applies equally to the monetary matters as it does to personal cost and coercion.
> We can't even agree on an objective truth, let alone rationalism.
Rational people can agree on objective truth because the truth is the truth, its based in objective measure, and regardless of what someone says it doesn't change the fact that X happened, there are people who can delude themselves certainly, but these people aren't true citizens, they've become no better than parasites.
There are a large number of people who seem silent only because the loudspeakers of social media and big tech have drowned out these people. They are still talking, but you, and many others have ignored them and blinded yourselves. That's a problem.
You are mistaken, the division today has not always existed, it was fostered through indoctrination, and other subtle manipulations over many generations following destructive false ideology. Important education was withheld, and the masses today are diminished. Philosophy and Critical Thinking used to be taught in what would normally be at the start of 4th grade.
> The only way this has any chance of improving is by first stopping the disinformation campaigns from polluting the minds of citizens, and then working on "healing the divide".
That is a rigid pipe-dream where it will never come to pass its a pigeonhole for an impossible to solve problem. Luckily it doesn't need to be solved.
The defects of such systems are failures where the weight and dynamics of those systems destroy the system itself. After the self-perpetuating dynamics of destruction have destroyed such systems, improvement will naturally occur, for those that survive.
> My claim is that the US as we know it today is doomed.
I disagree, because the important part is still present, just not in control. All this important part needs to do is get out of the way, and then build back better after those that held everyone else down take their boots off everyone's neck.
> How exactly this will play out is anyone's guess.
It will be the same as any major empire's fall. You can look to the history of Rome for an accurate picture, keeping in mind that unlike Rome the currency will ultimately fail by 2030-2032 at the same time, where independent producers will no longer be capable of making a profit and shut down, collapsing to non-market socialism and perpetual shortage, undermining all state efforts.
There will be communities based in those founding values that thrive in such grim times, because they are not dependent, they produce, and such communities will necessarily defend themselves and their sovereignty absent a rule of law (with is what we have today), in the only way possible.
The irony is, our external enemies don't need to lift a finger because they've infected the bureaucracy as any destructive parasite does, but the ideology they use blinds them and causes them to naturally neglect through the same willful blindness the dependency they have on us for economic calculation price data.
A socialist calculation problem manifesting globally, chaotically by its very nature, will inevitably make productive organization impossible in all un-sheltered communities. It destroys everything, and that is the insanity of this adversarial plan in which these enemies have engaged in over such a long period of time. Only an insane person will bring everything to the brink, and then unknowingly step over willingly having done so.
Rationalism provides the toolset to accurately predict the objective mechanics of reality, and by doing so predict the future, and nudge towards positive beneficial outcomes.
If one can't recognize reality, these people can't be anything more than a slave or prisoner (a Suki), without honor or worth.
- imiric 2y ago> Belief alone is worthless, you can believe something is true and in the face of objective truth know it is not. The thing that matters is whether reality shows its true or not. Again, what "objective truth"? In the age of disinformation, objectivity doesn't exist. There are only subjective "truths", where whoever has the most influence and reach decides what reality is for everyone else. Belief is the only thing that matters at this time. > Unlike communism, and socialism, there is no decision from a central authority who the true citizens are. There's not much difference from late-stages of capitalism and any other system. Power is centralized, an oligarchy rises to the top, disinformation and censorship are rampant, etc. > It comes down to objective reality and whether your actions show conformance to the founding father's principles. I find it amusing that Americans fetishize their founding fathers so much. These were fallible humans who lived in an entirely different world from ours. The system you enjoy today required dozens of amendments, reforms and revolutions over hundreds of years, yet what some rich politicians thought in the 18th century is held in highest regard, for some reason. > Rational people can agree on objective truth because the truth is the truth, its based in objective measure, and regardless of what someone says it doesn't change the fact that X happened Please. The world went through an epidemic that killed millions. Do you know the objective truth about what caused it? Was there foreign election interference in the 2020 election? Were the January 6th riots an attempt to overthrow the government? Is Donald Trump guilty of any of the crimes he was charged with, or was it a "witch hunt", "fake news", etc.? Is Elon Musk a Nazi or did he just make an awkward gesture? Was Epstein suicided? Was Pizzagate accurate? How about QAnon? These examples are neverending. You can call people who believe in conspiracy theories delusional and "parasites", but the fact is everyone is susceptible to psychological manipulation, regardless of their political inclination or ideology. You're not above it all and don't get to claim what the objective truth is. This is what disinformation ultimately causes. > You are mistaken, the division today has not always existed I'm not well versed in US history, but I do know that the precursors for the Civil War accrued over decades during the first half of the 19th century. Perhaps even before that. So, yes, the division was there since arguably the inception, and it never went away. It was just supressed, with occasional outbursts over time, but always ready to be reignited. > That is a rigid pipe-dream where it will never come to pass its a pigeonhole for an impossible to solve problem. Luckily it doesn't need to be solved. I agree with the first sentence. Disagree with the second if you wish to preserve your current union. If not, then sure, it doesn't need to be solved. > It will be the same as any major empire's fall. I'm confused. You disagree with my claim that America is doomed, yet agree that the empire will fall in the near future. To save us both some time: we disagree on whether disinformation is a problem, and whether and how it should be solved. I don't think either of us will change our mind about this, but cheers for the chat.