3 ms·

I don't follow this logic, I would in fact expect the executive branch to be auditing the executive branch. What congressionally mandated program was terminated

I don't follow this logic, I would in fact expect the executive branch to be auditing the executive branch. What congressionally mandated program was terminated? No spin is required, the people voted for this. Unfortunately one side wasn't able to convince the people that they didn't need this. That's where we are. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose. You make adjustments and move on.

9283409232 2y ago
> I don't follow this logic, I would in fact expect the executive branch to be auditing the executive branch. This is nonsense. It's like the police investigating themselves and finding no wrongdoing. You have a separate oversight organization do the audit because of conflict of interest and corruption.
- ganoushoreilly 2y ago
  It's nonsense in that is what was going on within the agencies. Our legal system is being leveraged. Don't like it, put forth a good claim and bring it to court. As it stands, it's all legal. That's on the voters if you don't like it.
throwaway894345 2y ago
Let’s be clear about the “auditors” who are “not trying to terminate congressionally mandated programs”. > USAID was a viper’s nest of radical-left marxists who hate America https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1886098373251301427?mx=2 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1886098373251301427?mx=2 > Congress passed the Foreign Assistance Act on September 4, 1961, which reorganized U.S. foreign assistance programs and mandated the creation of an agency to administer economic aid. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Agency_for_International_Development https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Agency_for_Int...
brookst 2y ago
I wouldn’t be opposed to an executive branch that implemented audits and took the results to congress to advocate for policy changes and department refactoring. I’m very opposed to an executive branch that audits programs they have political problems with, and use these no-oversight audits to kill agencies. That’s just authoritarianism.

9283409232 2y ago

> I don't follow this logic, I would in fact expect the executive branch to be auditing the executive branch. This is nonsense. It's like the police investigating themselves and finding no wrongdoing. You have a separate oversight organization do the audit because of conflict of interest and corruption.

ganoushoreilly 2y ago
It's nonsense in that is what was going on within the agencies. Our legal system is being leveraged. Don't like it, put forth a good claim and bring it to court. As it stands, it's all legal. That's on the voters if you don't like it.

throwaway894345 2y ago

Let’s be clear about the “auditors” who are “not trying to terminate congressionally mandated programs”. > USAID was a viper’s nest of radical-left marxists who hate America https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1886098373251301427?mx=2 https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1886098373251301427?mx=2 > Congress passed the Foreign Assistance Act on September 4, 1961, which reorganized U.S. foreign assistance programs and mandated the creation of an agency to administer economic aid. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Agency_for_International_Development https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Agency_for_Int...

brookst 2y ago

I wouldn’t be opposed to an executive branch that implemented audits and took the results to congress to advocate for policy changes and department refactoring. I’m very opposed to an executive branch that audits programs they have political problems with, and use these no-oversight audits to kill agencies. That’s just authoritarianism.