4 ms·
I'm extremely puzzled why you're bringing transgender people into this. You could've said "an opera in Columbia" and have had an equally valid argument about fi
by trickyager 2y ago
I'm extremely puzzled why you're bringing transgender people into this. You could've said "an opera in Columbia" and have had an equally valid argument about fiscal responsibilty and America's meddling in other countries. You, however, felt that it was morally necessary to mention that this was to benefit transgender people trying to live their lives as if that's a unique negative to be avoided.
How _very_ interesting.
- lawn 2y ago(Demonizing groups is a classic fascist tactic. They're spending money on bad group so therefore we're justified to do whatever.)
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- sjsdaiuasgdia 2y agoThis guy gets it. https://archive.is/g6ElI https://archive.is/g6ElI https://graphics.social/@metin/113865450624948092 https://graphics.social/@metin/113865450624948092
- koolba 2y agoI brought it up because if you took a poll of the Americans, the vast majority would be against spending money on it. And comparing it to just “an opera in Columbia”, I’d wager even less would support a transgender opera.
- trickyager 2y agoOooh. An appeal to a hypothetical consensus to justify transphobic opinions. Absolutely fascinating to see modern fascism at play.
- koolba 2y agoIt’s hardly hypothetical and to think otherwise is delusional.