If that were the case, then you are right.. However, the current crop of LLMs seem to be good at understanding the context. A scientific data point about bears

If that were the case, then you are right.. However, the current crop of LLMs seem to be good at understanding the context. A scientific data point about bears is unlikely to have Goldilocks in there (unless talking about evolution of life and Goldilocks zone). You can argue that there is meaning hidden in words that is not captured by words themselves in a given context - psychic knowledge as opposed to reasoned out knowledge. That is a philosophical debate.