3 ms·
I've never used Claude, but Perplexity often says that no definitive information about a topic could be found, and then tries to make some generalized inference
by ta8645 2y ago
I've never used Claude, but Perplexity often says that no definitive information about a topic could be found, and then tries to make some generalized inferences. There's a difference between a specific implementation, and the technology in general.
In any case, it's worthwhile for people to understand the limitations of the technology as it exists today. But calling it "bullshit" is a mischaracterization; I believe based on an emotional need for us to feel superior, and to dismiss the capabilities more thoroughly than they deserve.
It's a little like someone saying in the industrial revolution, "the steam shovel is too rigid, it will NEVER have the dexterity of a man with a shovel!". And while true and important to know, it really focuses on the wrong thing, it misses the advantages while amplifying the negatives.
- krupan 2y agoIf not bullshit then what would you call it?
- ta8645 2y agoAs the technology exists today: imperfect, often prone to mistakes, and unable to relay confidence levels. These problems may be addressed in future implementations. That's the same message, without any emotional baggage, or overly dismissive tone.
- krupan 2y agoThat would be great if those who are selling the technology described it that way. I, and apparently others, feel like maybe "bullshit" is a better counter to the current marketing for LLMs