> .NET is still called COM+ in .NET's source code There was mostly no reason to cause unnecessary code churn to rename pre-existing code with complus-named var

> .NET is still called COM+ in .NET's source code There was mostly no reason to cause unnecessary code churn to rename pre-existing code with complus-named variables inside dotnet/runtime. External-facing features and documentation never reference it. For compatibility reasons it still recognizes env. variables prefixed with COMPlus_ alongside DOTNET_ though. See: https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Adotnet%2Fruntime%20complus&type=code https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Adotnet%2Fruntime%20complu... In a similar vein, NativeAOT code still prominently references project RedHawk (these are slowly being renamed).