3 ms·
No, the point of the article is that later these can be modified to actually run these commands - obviously to call these scripts. You can assume pretty confide
by szundi 2y ago
No, the point of the article is that later these can be modified to actually run these commands - obviously to call these scripts. You can assume pretty confidently that when it seems to be a self contained good script, it is going to be called from services. Even if it is a bad investment to implement it, because programmers hate boring tasks. They would even choose to make a web of spaghettis for later generations than do boring stuff.
- IanCal 2y agoI absolutely agree you modify and automate parts (and eventually all) of it. It's the leap to having scripts in a repo being called from production services I'm less convinced by. As I said, the alternatives to part/incremental automation is none or total automation and total has the same issue right? Or do you mean by automating one step in a script, you risk someone using that part in a production service?